> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 17:38, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 03:40:51 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 18:17, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 17:19, Michal Marek wrote:
> >> >> On 28.10.2010 22:35, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >> >>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:46:31AM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> >> >>>> On 27.10.2010 20:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> >>>>> can we get this change dropped from linux-next until someone gets a
> >> >>>>> chance to fix it ?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Sorry I missed this thread. So your last patch
> >> >>>> (
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/19/488) did fix the Blackfin build
> >> >>>> failure? Can you submit it with a proper Signed-off-by and changelog?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Did you see the patch I posted in:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/19/534
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The one that fix up the cppflags usage.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I think this will solve the issue with blackfin nicely - and
> >> >>> make use of cppflags more as expected.
> >> >>
> >> >> As Mike noted - your patch does not strip the double quotes. And Mike's
> >> >> patch is really minimal, it just adds the SYMBOL_PREFIX definition to
> >> >> _a_flags. I'll look at your patch after this merge window.
> >> >
> >> > why am i seeing __initramfs_size failures in mainline now ?
> >>
> >> ping ... it looks like no one merged the VMLINUX_SYMBOL() changes in
> >> usr/initramfs_data.S proposed by Hendrik