> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 19:39 -0800, Paul Turner wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>> >
>> > * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
>> >
>> >> > I know, from the testing so far we _thought_ it was fairly sane. Apparently
>> >> > there's still some work to do.
>> >>
>> >> Damn thing bisected to:
>> >>
>> >> commit 92fd4d4d67b945c0766416284d4ab236b31542c4
>> >> Merge: fe7de49 e53beac
>> >> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>> >> Date: Thu Nov 18 13:22:14 2010 +0100
>> >>
>> >> Merge commit 'v2.6.37-rc2' into sched/core
>> >>
>> >> Merge reason: Move to a .37-rc base.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>> >>
>> >> 92fd4d4d67b945c0766416284d4ab236b31542c4 is the first bad commit
>> >
>> > Hm, i'd suggest to double check the two originator points:
>> >
>> > e53beac - is it really 'bad' ?
>> > fe7de49 - is it really 'good'?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Ingo
>> >
>>
>>
https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/29/566
>>
>> Should fix this.
>
> No, I had it in place where pertinent. Problem with bisection is that
> there are a couple of spots where X doesn't work. With X, it's obvious,
> less so in text console. Looks like I must have miscalled one of those.
>
> -Mike