> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> >> > I know, from the testing so far we _thought_ it was fairly sane. Apparently
> >> > there's still some work to do.
> >>
> >> Damn thing bisected to:
> >>
> >> commit 92fd4d4d67b945c0766416284d4ab236b31542c4
> >> Merge: fe7de49 e53beac
> >> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> >> Date: Thu Nov 18 13:22:14 2010 +0100
> >>
> >> Merge commit 'v2.6.37-rc2' into sched/core
> >>
> >> Merge reason: Move to a .37-rc base.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> >>
> >> 92fd4d4d67b945c0766416284d4ab236b31542c4 is the first bad commit
> >
> > Hm, i'd suggest to double check the two originator points:
> >
> > e53beac - is it really 'bad' ?
> > fe7de49 - is it really 'good'?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ingo
> >
>
>
https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/29/566
>
> Should fix this.