On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 13:07 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
quoted text >
> The motivation for simple-bus comes from Linux, but its definition is
> OS-neutral. It indicates that no special bus knowledge is required to
> access the devices under it.
That's never 100% true. In the case of ISA it's even less true due to
the difference between IO and Memory space.
quoted text > I don't think it applies to ISA, though -- I/O space is special bus
> knowledge, and the "ranges" looks weird for memory-space as well.
Right.
quoted text > If we're going to get rid of device_type here, it would be nice to
> have some other way to indicate that this node follows the ISA
> binding, without having to recognize an implementation-specific
> compatible.
The code in drivers/of/address.c uses the name property to match isa
busses.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 03/11] x86/dtb: Add a device tree for CE4100 , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , (Mon Nov 29, 1:05 pm)