On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:26 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
quoted text > > The OLPC interface might be of some use as a starting point, but would
> > need some work. It is currently in use on AMD Geode, Via C7, and Intel
> > Atom based systems, but, among other issues, it conflicts with the
> > Physical Address Extension feature.
> >
>
> It conflicts with at least PAE, PAT and x86-64. Since NX requires PAE,
> it also conflicts with that. As such, I would think it would have to be
> considered obsolete.
In any case, what is of interest to Sebastian here isn't the ABI for the
client interface, but the properties to put in the /cpus/ nodes, so we
could start with that...
Cheers,
Ben.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [sodaville] [PATCH 03/11] x86/dtb: Add a device tree f ... , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , (Mon Nov 29, 1:03 pm)