Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29 (aesni-intel)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Monday, November 29, 2010 - 9:31 am

On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:03:35 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:



on i386 builds, I get tons of these (and more) errors:

arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S:841: Error: bad register name `%r12'
arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S:842: Error: bad register name `%r13'
arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S:843: Error: bad register name `%r14'
arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S:844: Error: bad register name `%rsp'
arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S:849: Error: bad register name `%rsp'
arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S:850: Error: bad register name `%rsp'
arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S:851: Error: bad register name `%r9'

even though the kernel .config file says:

CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_586=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_NI_INTEL=m

Should arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_asm.S be testing
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
instead of
#ifdef __x86_64__
or does that not matter?

or is this a toolchain issue?

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for November 29, Stephen Rothwell, (Sun Nov 28, 8:03 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29, Zimny Lech, (Mon Nov 29, 2:47 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29, Zimny Lech, (Mon Nov 29, 6:18 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29, Herbert Xu, (Mon Nov 29, 7:57 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Nov 29, 9:12 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29 (aesni-intel), Randy Dunlap, (Mon Nov 29, 9:31 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29 (aesni-intel), Mathias Krause, (Mon Nov 29, 11:26 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29, Zimny Lech, (Mon Nov 29, 11:53 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29 (aesni-intel), Randy Dunlap, (Mon Nov 29, 11:54 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29 (aesni-intel), Mathias Krause, (Mon Nov 29, 12:21 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29 (aesni-intel), Randy Dunlap, (Mon Nov 29, 12:31 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29 (aesni-intel), Mathias Krause, (Mon Nov 29, 12:45 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29 (aesni-intel), Mathias Krause, (Mon Nov 29, 12:52 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29 (aesni-intel), Randy Dunlap, (Mon Nov 29, 12:54 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29 (aesni-intel), Randy Dunlap, (Mon Nov 29, 12:56 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29 (aesni-intel), Mathias Krause, (Mon Nov 29, 1:02 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29 (aesni-intel), Randy Dunlap, (Mon Nov 29, 1:11 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29 (aesni-intel), Mathias Krause, (Mon Nov 29, 1:21 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29 (aesni-intel), Randy Dunlap, (Mon Nov 29, 1:37 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for November 29 (aesni-intel), Mathias Krause, (Mon Nov 29, 1:46 pm)