Re: [patch 2/7] fs: simple fsync race fix

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Monday, November 29, 2010 - 7:58 am

Instead of removing the data sync support here and re-adding it later
I would recommend moving the enhanced sync_inode_metadata earlier in
the series.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 0/7] icache dirty / sync fixes, npiggin, (Tue Nov 23, 7:06 am)
[patch 1/7] fs: mark_inode_dirty barrier fix, npiggin, (Tue Nov 23, 7:06 am)
[patch 2/7] fs: simple fsync race fix, npiggin, (Tue Nov 23, 7:06 am)
[patch 5/7] fs: ext2 inode sync fix, npiggin, (Tue Nov 23, 7:06 am)
[patch 6/7] fs: fsync optimisations, npiggin, (Tue Nov 23, 7:06 am)
Re: [patch 2/7] fs: simple fsync race fix, Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Nov 29, 7:58 am)
Re: [patch 4/7] fs: preserve inode dirty bits on failed me ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Nov 29, 7:59 am)
Re: [patch 6/7] fs: fsync optimisations, Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Nov 29, 8:03 am)
Re: [patch 3/7] fs: introduce inode writeback helpers, Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Nov 29, 8:13 am)
Re: [patch 6/7] fs: fsync optimisations, Nick Piggin, (Mon Nov 29, 5:11 pm)
Re: [patch 3/7] fs: introduce inode writeback helpers, Nick Piggin, (Mon Nov 29, 5:22 pm)