Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*()

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Grant Likely
Date: Sunday, November 28, 2010 - 11:07 pm

On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:55 PM, David Gibson
<david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

I'd also be okay with either dtflat_ or flatdt_ for the prefix on
these routines.

g.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RE: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*(), Stephen Neuendorffer, (Wed Nov 24, 10:02 am)
RE: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() to dt_*(), Stephen Neuendorffer, (Wed Nov 24, 11:32 am)
Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() t ..., Geert Uytterhoeven, (Thu Nov 25, 7:01 am)
Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() t ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Thu Nov 25, 1:52 pm)
Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() t ..., Michael Ellerman, (Thu Nov 25, 10:50 pm)
Re: RFC: Mega rename of device tree routines from of_*() t ..., Grant Likely, (Sun Nov 28, 11:07 pm)