On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:40:27 +0100, Damien Wyart said:
quoted text
> Hi,
> 
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> [2010-11-27 21:15]:
> > How does this work for you? Its hideous but lets start simple.
> > [...]
> 
> Doesn't give wrong numbers like initial bug and tentative patches, but
> feels a bit too slow when numbers go up and down. Correct values are
> reached when waiting long enough, but it feels slow.

Umm.. maybe the code still averages the 1/5/15 over that many minute's
worth of ticks, which may be longer for a tickless kernel?