On 11/19/2010 01:40 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted text > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>>
>> Just for info, UDF BKL removal patches seem to work fine but I want to
>> give them some final SMP testing on Monday before pushing them to -next.
>> I'm not sure how much people hurry with disabling the lock so if I should
>> push them ASAP or whether the next merge window is fine...
>
> I don't think I can reasonably do it in 37, we're late enough in the
> -rc series. So UDF and really saying 'n' to BKL by default will have
> to be for the next merge window.
>
> I hate to do it, but I'd be too nervous about it any other way.
>
> Linus
Could it not default to "n" but be SELECTed by the like of UDF. Or
that too big of a Kconfig change for 37-rcX? I understand it does
not really buy us anything for distro's with allmodconfig style,
but it should help with defconfig on all the other ARCH's.
Thanks
Boaz
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up , Boaz Harrosh , (Sun Nov 21, 7:12 am)