Re: [patch] x86: avoid unnecessary smp alternatives switch during suspend/resume

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Sunday, November 21, 2010 - 3:03 am

On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 08:27:41PM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:

I agree, it would be nicer if we don't introduce a special flag
just for that. Other than that, I like all sane code that speeds up
suspend/resume :). I've attached before/after dmesg excerpts on my
system with the patch ontop of v2.6.37-rc2-181-gb86db47. We end up
saving 11601 µsecs according to CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME but hey, the code is
simple enough :).

Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch] x86: avoid unnecessary smp alternatives switch ..., Borislav Petkov, (Sun Nov 21, 3:03 am)
[tip:x86/alternatives] x86, suspend: Avoid unnecessary smp ..., tip-bot for Suresh S ..., (Tue Dec 14, 2:21 pm)
Re: [tip:x86/alternatives] x86, suspend: Avoid unnecessary ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Dec 14, 3:31 pm)