Re: [patch] x86: avoid unnecessary smp alternatives switch during suspend/resume

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Nigel Cunningham
Date: Sunday, November 21, 2010 - 2:27 am

Hi.

On 20/11/10 11:09, Suresh Siddha wrote:
We have a few others things that want to modify their behaviour 
according to whether we're doing the atomic copy/restore. Perhaps it 
would be an idea to just use a single flag, perhaps a value for 
system_state?

Nigel
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch] x86: avoid unnecessary smp alternatives switch ..., Nigel Cunningham, (Sun Nov 21, 2:27 am)
[tip:x86/alternatives] x86, suspend: Avoid unnecessary smp ..., tip-bot for Suresh S ..., (Tue Dec 14, 2:21 pm)
Re: [tip:x86/alternatives] x86, suspend: Avoid unnecessary ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Dec 14, 3:31 pm)