2.6.35-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>

commit 15714f7b58011cf3948cab2988abea560240c74f upstream.

Commit 4a5a5c73 attempted to pass decent error messages back to userspace for
netfilter errors.  In xt_SECMARK.c however the patch screwed up and returned
on 0 (aka no error) early and didn't finish setting up secmark.  This results
in a kernel BUG if you use SECMARK.

Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

---
 net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int secmark_tg_check(const struct
 	switch (info->mode) {
 	case SECMARK_MODE_SEL:
 		err = checkentry_selinux(info);
-		if (err <= 0)
+		if (err)
 			return err;
 		break;
 


--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/