On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:54:27AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted text > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > We decided the kmalloc was ok, but Linus didn't like this approach. I
> > kept it in my tree because I didn't want to remember when/if to add the
> > special check in the accurate rmap walks. I find it simpler if all
> > rmap walks are accurate by default.
>
> Why isn't the existing cheap solution sufficient?
It is sufficient.
quoted text > My opinion is still that we shouldn't add the expense to the common
> case, and it's the uncommon case (migration) that should just handle
> it.
Ok, I'll remove this patch from the next submit.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 02 of 66] mm, migration: Fix race between shift ... , Andrea Arcangeli , (Fri Nov 19, 12:26 pm)