> On 11/17/2010 04:39 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >> I'm sorry but in-kernel CR already looks like a major misdesign to me.
> >
> > By this do you mean the very idea of having CR support in the kernel?
> > Or our design of it in the kernel?
>
> The former, I'm afraid.
>
> > Let's go back to July 2008, at the containers mini-summit, where it
> > was unanimously agreed upon that the kernel was the right place
> > (Checkpoint/Resetart [CR] under
> >
http://wiki.openvz.org/Containers/Mini-summit_2008_notes ), and that
> > we would start by supporting a single task with no resources. Was
> > that whole discussion effectively misguided, in your opinion? Or do
> > you feel that since the first steps outlined in that discussion
> > we've either "gone too far" or strayed in the subsequent design?
>
> The conclusion doesn't seem like such a good idea, well, at least to
> me for what it's worth. Conclusions at summits don't carry decisive
> weight.