> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:48:48AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Wed, 17.11.10 17:27, Greg KH (
greg@kroah.com) wrote:
> >
> > > I can do any one, or multiple things from the following options:
> > >
> > > - disable the existing ioctl to return an error so that no new
> > > userspace program starts to use it thinking it is valid
> > > - accept Werner's patch for those who like proc files
> > > - accept Kay's patch
> > >
> > > Any suggestions?
> >
> > Maybe this is not so surprising, but I definitely want item #3 from the
> > list.
> >
> > I am against #2, since #1 is a much nicer solution, and having both
> > would be needlessly redundant.
>
> I think you mean s/1/3/ here, right?
>
> And yes, having both will be redundant, and Werner seems to not be
> responding anymore as to why he feels his patch is somehow still needed
> given that Kay's patch accomplishes the same thing from what I can tell.