Re: [RFC][PATCH 18/22] sched: add reclaiming logic to -deadline tasks

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Luca Abeni
Date: Monday, November 15, 2010 - 12:39 pm

On 15/11/10 19:37, James H. Anderson wrote:
[...]
[...]
BTW, I think we are aligned on this.

I was a little bit surprised when Peter mentioned allocating a runtime 
equal to the average execution time (because of the meta-stability 
considerations that Tommaso also mentioned), but I fully agree that if 
the allocated runtime is higher than the average execution time then the 
queue is stable and it's possible to find a bound for the expected 
tardiness (or even its probability distribution... This is similar to my 
"probabilistic deadlines").


			Luca
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC][PATCH 18/22] sched: add reclaiming logic to -dea ..., Tommaso Cucinotta, (Fri Nov 12, 11:07 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 18/22] sched: add reclaiming logic to -dea ..., Tommaso Cucinotta, (Fri Nov 12, 6:49 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 18/22] sched: add reclaiming logic to -dea ..., James H. Anderson, (Mon Nov 15, 11:37 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 18/22] sched: add reclaiming logic to -dea ..., Luca Abeni, (Mon Nov 15, 12:39 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 18/22] sched: add reclaiming logic to -dea ..., James H. Anderson, (Mon Nov 15, 12:49 pm)