> +static enum ucode_state xen_request_microcode_user(int cpu,
quoted text
> +						   const void __user *buf, size_t size)
> +{
> +	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
> +	struct xen_microcode *uc;
> +	enum ucode_state ret;
> +	size_t unread;
> +
> +	if (cpu != 0) {
> +		/* No real firmware for non-zero cpus; just store a
> +		   placeholder */
> +		size = 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (uci->mc != NULL) {
> +		vfree(uci->mc);
> +		uci->mc = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = UCODE_ERROR;
> +	uc = vmalloc(sizeof(*uc) + size);
> +	if (uc == NULL)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	uc->len = size;
> +
> +	ret = UCODE_NFOUND;
> +
> +	/* XXX This sporadically returns uncopied bytes, so we return
> +	   EFAULT.  As far as I can see, the usermode code
           ^^^^^ UCODE_NFOUND.
quoted text
> +	   (microcode_ctl) isn't doing anything wrong... */

Is this still valid? Looking at AMD it checks for a magic key and the Intel
just copies without checks.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/