Re: [PATCH] cleanup kswapd()

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mel Gorman
Date: Monday, November 15, 2010 - 2:42 am

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 06:05:26PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

As pointed out elsewhere, this should be static.


Very minor but that comment should now fit on fewer lines.


I posted a patch adding a comment on why set_pgdat_percpu_threshold() is
called. I do not believe it has been picked up by Andrew but it if is,
the patches will conflict. The resolution will be obvious but you may
need to respin this patch if the comment patch gets picked up in mmotm.

Otherwise, I see no problems.


-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] cleanup kswapd(), KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sun Nov 14, 2:05 am)
Re: [PATCH] cleanup kswapd(), Jesper Juhl, (Sun Nov 14, 4:03 am)
Re: [PATCH] cleanup kswapd(), KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sun Nov 14, 5:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH] cleanup kswapd(), KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sun Nov 14, 6:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH] cleanup kswapd(), Mel Gorman, (Mon Nov 15, 2:42 am)
[PATCH v3] factor out kswapd sleeping logic from kswapd(), KOSAKI Motohiro, (Mon Nov 15, 11:07 pm)