On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 07:21:50PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted text
> So when Richard Gunther says "a memory clobber doesn't cover automatic
> storage", to me that very clearly spells "gcc is buggy as hell".
> Because automatic storage with its address taken _very_ much gets
> clobbered by things like memset etc. If the compiler doesn't
> understand that, the compiler is just broken.

I'll leave the discussion about meaning of "memory" clobber aside to
Richard,

quoted text
> And now, if even the (superfluous) "+m" isn't working, it sounds like
> we have no sane options left. Except to say that gcc-4.5.1 is totally

just to say that of course there are sane options left.

	    :"=a"(rc), "+m" (*regs)
            :    "a"(regs)
            :    "%ebx", "%ecx", "%edx", "%esi", "%edi", "memory");

is simply too high register pressure for i386 if you force also
-fno-omit-frame-pointer, there is not a single register left.

Yes, reload should figure out it has address of regs already tied to %eax,
unfortunately starting with IRA it doesn't (I'll file a GCC bug about that;
so that leaves 4.4/4.5/4.6 currently not being able to compile it).

That said, changing the inline asm to just clobber one less register
would be completely sufficient to make it work well with all gccs out there,
just push/pop one of the register around the whole body.  I doubt calling
out SMM BIOS is actually so performance critical that one push and one pop
would ruin it.  Of course x86_64 version can stay as is, there are enough
registers left...

	Jakub
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/