Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2010 » November » 14

Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Ben Gamari
Subject: Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof)
Date: Saturday, November 13, 2010 - 10:20 pm

On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:09:29 +0900 (JST), KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
Alright, fair enough. It still seems like there are many cases where
fadvise seems more appropriate, but memcg should at least satisfy my
personal needs so I'll shut up now. Thanks!

- Ben
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), Ben Gamari, (Wed Nov 3, 10:58 pm)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue Nov 9, 12:28 am)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue Nov 9, 1:03 am)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), Ben Gamari, (Tue Nov 9, 5:54 am)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sat Nov 13, 10:09 pm)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), Ben Gamari, (Sat Nov 13, 10:20 pm)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), Brian K. White, (Sun Nov 14, 2:33 pm)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), Minchan Kim, (Sun Nov 14, 11:07 pm)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), KOSAKI Motohiro, (Mon Nov 15, 12:09 am)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), Minchan Kim, (Mon Nov 15, 12:19 am)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), KOSAKI Motohiro, (Mon Nov 15, 12:28 am)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), Minchan Kim, (Mon Nov 15, 12:46 am)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Nov 15, 1:47 am)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), Minchan Kim, (Mon Nov 15, 2:05 am)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), KOSAKI Motohiro, (Mon Nov 15, 2:10 am)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), Ben Gamari, (Mon Nov 15, 5:46 am)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), Rik van Riel, (Mon Nov 15, 7:48 am)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), Minchan Kim, (Wed Nov 17, 3:16 am)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), Minchan Kim, (Wed Nov 17, 4:15 am)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), Rik van Riel, (Wed Nov 17, 9:22 am)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), Minchan Kim, (Wed Nov 17, 7:47 pm)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), Rik van Riel, (Wed Nov 17, 8:24 pm)
Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof), Minchan Kim, (Wed Nov 17, 8:46 pm)