Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm,vmscan: Reclaim order-0 and compact instead of lumpy reclaim when under light pressure

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mel Gorman
Date: Friday, November 12, 2010 - 2:37 am

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 07:07:04PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:

Gack, I posted the slightly wrong version. This version prevents lumpy
reclaim ever being used. The figures I posted were for a patch where
this condition looked like

        if (COMPACTION_BUILD && priority > DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
                sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = LUMPY_MODE_COMPACTION;
        else
                sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode = LUMPY_MODE_CONTIGRECLAIM;

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm,vmscan: Reclaim order-0 and compact ins ..., Mel Gorman, (Fri Nov 12, 2:37 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Use compaction to reduce a dependency ..., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sat Nov 13, 10:31 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm,vmscan: Convert lumpy_mode into a bitmask, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sat Nov 13, 10:40 pm)