On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:16:48AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:01:51 am Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Rusty, Michael,
> > 
> > any comments?  I think Dave's observation is correct, and the lack of
> > a mempool for allocations in the virtio stack is a no-go for virtio_blk.
> 
> Interesting.  virtio will try to fall back to using direct ring entries
> if it can, but if course if your request is too large it can never do that.
> 
> So, we could add a memory pool, or restrict the request size in virtio_blk.

The mempool looks like the more generic solution.  Especially as people
are still talking about swap over nfs, at which point virtio-net will
show the same issue (just even harder to reproduce)

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/