Re: [RFC v1 PATCH 4/6] input: pmic8058_pwrkey: Add support for power key

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Dmitry Torokhov
Date: Thursday, November 11, 2010 - 12:21 am

Hi Trilkok,

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 06:17:59PM +0530, Trilok Soni wrote:

Why do we need to delay KEY_POWER reporting? Do we need to use high
resolution timers or regular timers would do as well? KEY_END appears to
be abused (you don't want to move your cursor to the end of line, do
you?). Also I wonder if header file should reside in linux/mfd with the
rest of pmic8058 components.

Thanks. 


-- 
Dmitry
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC v1 PATCH 3/6] led: pmic8058: Add PMIC8058 leds driver, Lars-Peter Clausen, (Wed Nov 10, 1:45 pm)
Re: [RFC v1 PATCH 3/6] led: pmic8058: Add PMIC8058 leds driver, Lars-Peter Clausen, (Wed Nov 10, 4:50 pm)
Re: [RFC v1 PATCH 4/6] input: pmic8058_pwrkey: Add support ..., Dmitry Torokhov, (Thu Nov 11, 12:21 am)
Re: [RFC v1 PATCH 6/6] drivers: rtc: Add support for Qualc ..., Lars-Peter Clausen, (Fri Nov 12, 5:53 am)
RE: [RFC v1 PATCH 5/6] input: pmic8058-othc: Add support f ..., Datta, Shubhrajyoti, (Mon Nov 15, 10:36 pm)
Re: [RFC v1 PATCH 3/6] led: pmic8058: Add PMIC8058 leds driver, Lars-Peter Clausen, (Tue Dec 7, 8:11 am)