* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

quoted text
> OK by me, apart from ...
> 
> a) I'd question the need for the config option.  Are distros really
>    so lame that they can't trust themselves to poke a number into
>    procfs at boot time?

When it comes to security i personally prefer 'permanent' defaults that is a 
property of the booting image. I'd even change the default for the x86 defconfig for 
example - and we could make this option default-y in the future. (We cannot ever 
make the sysctl default itself default-1, it would break compatibility with old 
behavior.)

quoted text
> b) we have "dmesg_restrict" and "CONFIG_RESTRICT_DMESG".  Less
>    dyslexia, please.

Good point. CONFIG_DMESG_RESTRICT is the proper hierarchical naming i suspect.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/