On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:41:40PM -0800, john stultz wrote:
quoted text
> > It may happen with opportunistic suspend if the system boots very fast.
> 
> Right, but a system using opportunistic suspend will have a hard enough
> time keeping close NTP sync on its own given the frequent switching
> between the fine-grained ntp adjusted clocksource during run-time and
> the coarse non-adjusted RTC/persisitent_clock while suspended.
> 
> So I think such a system would be fine it falls back to using just the
> boot-calibration for TSC freq rather then the refined calibration freq
> calculated by this patch (which will happen automatically if the refined
> calibration is off by 1%).
> 
> Does that seem like a reasonable tradeoff?

Yes it sounds good to me.  Some inaccuracy in this case is fine I guess.
Just major inaccuracy or a crash or hang wouldn't be good.

-Andi
-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/