On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:25:55AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:02:35AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > cifs and jfs contain the non-trivial changes, where they no longer
> > overwrite dentry name in their d_compare(), but rather use the
> > d_revalidate() method for ensuring case preservation in the presence
> > of negative dentries, taken from fatfs.
> 
> Please split these out to separate patches, and make sure you get

Yeah, good suggestion.

quoted text
> a review and testing from the jfs and cifs maintainers.  I don't think
> this is .37 material any more.

We'll see. It's pretty trivial to test really, and method reused
from fatfs.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/