On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 05:03:44PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
quoted text
> In kvm_async_pf_wakeup_all(), we add a dummy apf to vcpu->async_pf.done
> without holding vcpu->async_pf.lock, it will break if we are handling apfs
> at this time.
> 
This should never happen to well behaved guest, but malicious guest can do it
on purpose.

quoted text
> Also use 'list_empty_careful()' instead of 'list_empty()'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>

quoted text
> ---
>  virt/kvm/async_pf.c |    5 ++++-
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/async_pf.c b/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
> index d57ec92..6ef3373 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/async_pf.c
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ int kvm_async_pf_wakeup_all(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_async_pf *work;
>  
> -	if (!list_empty(&vcpu->async_pf.done))
> +	if (!list_empty_careful(&vcpu->async_pf.done))
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	work = kmem_cache_zalloc(async_pf_cache, GFP_ATOMIC);
> @@ -211,7 +211,10 @@ int kvm_async_pf_wakeup_all(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	get_page(bad_page);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&work->queue); /* for list_del to work */
>  
> +	spin_lock(&vcpu->async_pf.lock);
>  	list_add_tail(&work->link, &vcpu->async_pf.done);
> +	spin_unlock(&vcpu->async_pf.lock);
> +
>  	vcpu->async_pf.queued++;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.7.0.4

--
			Gleb.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/