Re: sysfs and power management

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Onkalo Samu
Date: Monday, November 1, 2010 - 3:41 am

On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 15:25 +0100, ext Greg KH wrote:


I took a look to that. It seems that iio is more or less sysfs based.
There are ring buffers and event device which are chardev based
but still the data outside ring buffer and the control is sysfs based.

By getting open and close from sysfs would be nice from the driver
point of view. However, I understand that this is just overhead for
majority of the cases.

Regards,
Samu


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
sysfs and power management, Onkalo Samu, (Wed Oct 27, 3:59 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Alan Cox, (Wed Oct 27, 4:48 am)
RE: sysfs and power management, samu.p.onkalo, (Wed Oct 27, 6:43 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Alan Cox, (Wed Oct 27, 7:28 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Greg KH, (Fri Oct 29, 12:50 pm)
Re: sysfs and power management, Henrique de Moraes H ..., (Sat Oct 30, 7:00 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Onkalo Samu, (Sun Oct 31, 4:57 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Greg KH, (Sun Oct 31, 7:25 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Onkalo Samu, (Mon Nov 1, 3:41 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Alan Cox, (Mon Nov 1, 9:57 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Greg KH, (Mon Nov 1, 11:07 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Alan Cox, (Wed Nov 3, 2:44 am)
RE: sysfs and power management, samu.p.onkalo, (Wed Nov 3, 3:48 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Greg KH, (Wed Nov 3, 6:09 am)
RE: sysfs and power management, samu.p.onkalo, (Wed Nov 3, 8:00 am)