Re: [patch 1/1] ecryptfs: call __vfs_setxattr_noperm() in ecryptfs_setxattr()

Previous thread: linux-next: Tree for October 5 by Stephen Rothwell on Monday, October 4, 2010 - 10:12 pm. (4 messages)

Next thread: Build failure on CONFIG_DEBUG_FORCE_WEAK_PER_CPU? by Namhyung Kim on Tuesday, October 5, 2010 - 12:23 am. (5 messages)
From: Tyler Hicks
Date: Monday, October 4, 2010 - 11:23 pm

Hi Roberto - Thanks for the fix. However, it seems to me like we should
call vfs_setxattr(). We can't guarantee consistency among the eCryptfs
inode and the lower inode, so the extra call to xattr_permission()
--

Previous thread: linux-next: Tree for October 5 by Stephen Rothwell on Monday, October 4, 2010 - 10:12 pm. (4 messages)

Next thread: Build failure on CONFIG_DEBUG_FORCE_WEAK_PER_CPU? by Namhyung Kim on Tuesday, October 5, 2010 - 12:23 am. (5 messages)