On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
quoted text
> On 10/04/2010 02:12 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:02 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually, cpu_has() depends on:
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_X86_P6_NOP) || defined(CONFIG_X86_64)
>>
>> Ahh. Right you are. The place that depends on just P6_NOP is the
>> default NOP choice logic in <asm/nops.h>
>>
>> But the end result ends up being the same: can we please clean this
>> all up so that it isn't so confusing? Rather than add to the
>> confusion?
>>
>
> Agreed that this should be cleaned up.  However, in the meantime I'd
> like to keep Borislav's patch in the tree since it makes the code
> technically correct at least.

Another piece of the confusion I noticed a couple of days ago:
X86_MINIMUM_CPU_FAMILY defaults to "6" if X86_32 &&
X86_P6_NOP; whereas X86_P6_NOP depends on X86_64.

Hugh
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/