On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 04:46:56PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
quoted text
> Sorry about the delay.  I was off last week.
> 
> How about something like this?  It probably needs to be split into two
> patches.  It provides more information on which CPU was requested and
> eventually chosen and separates queueing and activation which can be
> useful for analyzing latency or freezer issues.
> 
> Thanks.



Yep looks good. I hadn't thought about frozen works.

Thanks.

(I think this should go through your tree rather than the tracing tree).

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/