Re: [PATCH 2/7] cgroups: Allow to bind a subsystem to a cgroup hierarchy

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Paul Menage
Date: Thursday, October 28, 2010 - 4:55 pm

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

Maybe call this "bindable"?

Basic idea looks great, it could do with a bunch more comments, and
maybe locking rules.

Is there any chance of a lock inversion between dir->i_mutex and
cgroup_lock in hierarchy_popuiate_dir() ?

Paul
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 1/7] cgroups: Shrink struct cgroup_subsys, Li Zefan, (Fri Oct 22, 1:09 am)
Re: [PATCH 7/7] cgroups: Update documentation for bindable ..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Sun Oct 24, 5:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/7] cgroups: Shrink struct cgroup_subsys, Paul Menage, (Thu Oct 28, 4:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/7] cgroups: Allow to bind a subsystem to a cg ..., Paul Menage, (Thu Oct 28, 4:55 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/7] cgroups: Shrink struct cgroup_subsys, Paul Menage, (Tue Nov 9, 2:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/7] cgroups: Shrink struct cgroup_subsys, Paul Menage, (Tue Nov 9, 6:53 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/7] cgroups: Shrink struct cgroup_subsys, Paul Menage, (Tue Nov 9, 7:15 pm)