Re: linux-next: Tree for October 20

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Michal Marek
Date: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 - 2:20 pm

On 26.10.2010 18:22, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:

OK, if you mix O= and non-O= builds then things can break in various
ways. That's why the top-level Makefile tries to detect this and abort,
unfortunately the check is not strict enough (it checks for the presence
of include/config/kernel.release, which is not created yet when you run
make *config). Christoph, is it possible that your case was the same,
ie. that you had run make *config in the source tree before?

In that case, I'd like to skip this bug for 2.6.37-rc1, because 1) it's
a user error, 2) Linus shortened the merge window and last-minute
changes to the top-level Makefile can cause more harm and good, 3) I
have flu and I only check my mail occasionally this week, so the less
stuff to deal with, the better :). I'll come up with a fix for -rc2 or so.

Michal
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for October 20, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue Oct 19, 10:20 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for October 20 (xen), Randy Dunlap, (Wed Oct 20, 9:28 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for October 20 (xen), Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Wed Oct 20, 10:09 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for October 20 (xen), Randy Dunlap, (Wed Oct 20, 10:21 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for October 20, Christoph Hellwig, (Thu Oct 21, 6:09 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for October 20, Zimny Lech, (Thu Oct 21, 6:21 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for October 20, Michal Marek, (Mon Oct 25, 1:47 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for October 20, Arnaud Lacombe, (Tue Oct 26, 9:22 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for October 20, Michal Marek, (Wed Oct 27, 2:20 pm)