Weird, then why did the percpu code interleaved cpus 16-31 between
node 0 and 1? Percpu layout code tries pretty hard to group cpus into
percpu units according to NUMA mapping but if the nodes are too
unbalanced that doing so would result in too big waste of address
space, it gives up. I _think_ that's what happened with the weird
24:8 NUMA split on 32bit. So, the interesting part is cpus 16-31 not
0-15.
--
tejun
--