>-----Original Message-----
quoted text
>From: ext Alan Cox [mailto:alan@linux.intel.com]
>
>> I started to wonder if it makes sense to enhance sysfs so that it
>> optionally prodives open / close call backs. Internally sysfs has
>> some bookkeeping about the refcount but this is not visible to the
>> driver. Of course majority of the sysfs users doesn't need that at all
>> and for them this is just overhead.
>
>I think we need it. There doesn't need to be much overhead however as
>there is no need (or sense) in providing per sysfs node open/close
>hooks.

Do you mean per device hook and each sysfs open / close uses 
per device ref-counting.

So the driver would just know that some sysfs  entry is open 
or all the entries are closed. I think that this kind of behavior
is ok for this purpose.

quoted text
>
>The pm layer also lacks a clean race-free way to actually ascertain
>when the device was last kicked out of pm saving.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/