Re: sysfs and power management

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alan Cox
Date: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 - 4:48 am

> I started to wonder if it makes sense to enhance sysfs so that it

I think we need it. There doesn't need to be much overhead however as
there is no need (or sense) in providing per sysfs node open/close
hooks.

The pm layer also lacks a clean race-free way to actually ascertain
when the device was last kicked out of pm saving.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
sysfs and power management, Onkalo Samu, (Wed Oct 27, 3:59 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Alan Cox, (Wed Oct 27, 4:48 am)
RE: sysfs and power management, samu.p.onkalo, (Wed Oct 27, 6:43 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Alan Cox, (Wed Oct 27, 7:28 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Greg KH, (Fri Oct 29, 12:50 pm)
Re: sysfs and power management, Henrique de Moraes H ..., (Sat Oct 30, 7:00 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Onkalo Samu, (Sun Oct 31, 4:57 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Greg KH, (Sun Oct 31, 7:25 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Onkalo Samu, (Mon Nov 1, 3:41 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Alan Cox, (Mon Nov 1, 9:57 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Greg KH, (Mon Nov 1, 11:07 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Alan Cox, (Wed Nov 3, 2:44 am)
RE: sysfs and power management, samu.p.onkalo, (Wed Nov 3, 3:48 am)
Re: sysfs and power management, Greg KH, (Wed Nov 3, 6:09 am)
RE: sysfs and power management, samu.p.onkalo, (Wed Nov 3, 8:00 am)