Re: [PATCH 01/11] IMA: use rbtree instead of radix tree for inode information cache

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Al Viro
Date: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 - 11:13 am

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 08:22:31AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:


FWIW, I'm OK with that.  My general opinion about the quality and
usefulness of security/* is a separate story, but if we are stuck
with that shit in the tree, let's at least trim down what can be
trimmed down.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 07/11] IMA: move read counter into struct inode, Eric Paris, (Mon Oct 25, 11:41 am)
[PATCH 08/11] IMA: only allocate iint when needed, Eric Paris, (Mon Oct 25, 11:42 am)
[PATCH 11/11] IMA: fix the ToMToU logic, Eric Paris, (Mon Oct 25, 11:42 am)
Re: [PATCH 01/11] IMA: use rbtree instead of radix tree fo ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Oct 25, 1:57 pm)
Re: [PATCH 01/11] IMA: use rbtree instead of radix tree fo ..., Al Viro, (Tue Oct 26, 11:13 am)