login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2010
»
October
»
25
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-current tree related)
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Stephen Hemminger
Subject:
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-current tree related)
Date: Monday, October 25, 2010 - 10:36 am
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 22:26:02 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
quoted text
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:19:56 +1100 > > > I wish doing that caused a build failure on other architectures ... > > Me too :-/ > > > Subject: [PATCH] l2tp: static functions should not be exported > > I'll add this thanks Stephen.
The section mismatch warning on x86 is not shown by default because there are still so many problems. -- --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (n ...
, Stephen Rothwell
, (Sun Oct 24, 8:19 pm)
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tre ...
, David Miller
, (Sun Oct 24, 10:26 pm)
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tre ...
, Stephen Hemminger
, (Mon Oct 25, 10:36 am)
Section msimatch warnings (Was: Re: linux-next: build fail ...
, Stephen Rothwell
, (Mon Oct 25, 4:04 pm)
Re: Section msimatch warnings
, David Miller
, (Mon Oct 25, 4:27 pm)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
monstr
[PATCH 46/56] microblaze_v2: headers files entry.h current.h mman.h registers.h se...
Jan Engelhardt
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
Dave Jones
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
Michael Moore
Re: underage models, pre teen models, lolita porn, young preteens, little lolitas
Lars-Peter Clausen
[PATCH v4] MMC: Add JZ4740 mmc driver
git
:
Andy Parkins
git-fetch fails with error code 128
Eli Zaretskii
Re: Switching from CVS to GIT
Jan Harkes
Re: git-svn and huge data and modifying the git-svn-HEAD branch directly
Dan Chokola
Re: how do you "force a pull"?
Johan Herland
Re: Comment on weak refs
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
No need to do lock_super() for exclusion in generic_shutdown_super()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
x86, msr: Export the register-setting MSR functions via /dev/*/msr
Linux Kernel Mailing List
MIPS: SMTC: Fix lockup in smtc_distribute_timer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Input: gpio-keys - add support for disabling gpios through sysfs
Linux Kernel Mailing List
sh-sci: update receive error handling for muxed irqs
linux-netdev
:
Patrick McHardy
Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket
Ilpo Järvinen
net-next/unix: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
Herbert Xu
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Evgeniy Polyakov
Re: virt-manager broken by bind(0) in net-next.
Eric Dumazet
Re: [PATCH] conntrack: use SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU for nf_conn structs
openbsd-misc
:
elitdostlar
Seks partneri arayan bayanlar bu adreste - 8878xs706x6438
Marcus Andree
Re: This is what Linus Torvalds calls openBSD crowd
Lars D. Noodén
Re: sshd.config and AllowUsers
Henning Brauer
Re: Sun Blade 1000?
Laurens Vets
Re: OT: opinions on IDS / IPS solutions
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate