Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_<level>

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 - 11:03 am

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:46:40PM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:

I don't really understand the resistance to add the module name to the default
pr_fmt in kernel.h, and I really don't like the idea to spread pr_fmt defines
throughout the code instead.

Maybe I am missing something, but to me the result of this cleanup is less clean 
code than before.

What is your take ?

Guenter
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_&lt;level&gt;, Joe Perches, (Tue Oct 19, 4:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_&lt;level&gt;, Henrik Rydberg, (Tue Oct 19, 11:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_&lt;level&gt;, Guenter Roeck, (Wed Oct 20, 10:18 am)
Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_&lt;level&gt;, Guenter Roeck, (Wed Oct 20, 10:48 am)
Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_<level>, Guenter Roeck, (Wed Oct 20, 11:03 am)
Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_&lt;level&gt;, Guenter Roeck, (Wed Oct 20, 11:35 am)
Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_&lt;level&gt;, Davidlohr Bueso, (Wed Oct 20, 12:19 pm)