Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_<level>

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 - 7:46 am

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 03:34:38AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
[ ... ]
Actually, I do this kind of thing all the time when backporting.
It is easier to apply all patches applied to a driver than skipping
the cleanup patches, to avoid conflicts when cherry-picking functional
patches. The tendency for large cleanup patches affecting several drivers
and modules created trouble for me several times already.

Good point. I am using git all the time, so it isn't that much of a
problem for me. Our mailer problems (the tabs replacing stuff) are
much more annoying.

coretemp, pkgtemp, via-cputemp, ltc4261 (new), lis3, hp_accel

Guenter
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_&lt;level&gt;, Joe Perches, (Tue Oct 19, 4:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_&lt;level&gt;, Henrik Rydberg, (Tue Oct 19, 11:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_<level>, Guenter Roeck, (Wed Oct 20, 7:46 am)
Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_&lt;level&gt;, Guenter Roeck, (Wed Oct 20, 10:18 am)
Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_&lt;level&gt;, Guenter Roeck, (Wed Oct 20, 10:48 am)
Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_&lt;level&gt;, Guenter Roeck, (Wed Oct 20, 11:03 am)
Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_&lt;level&gt;, Guenter Roeck, (Wed Oct 20, 11:35 am)
Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon: Use pr_fmt and pr_&lt;level&gt;, Davidlohr Bueso, (Wed Oct 20, 12:19 pm)