Re: [PATCH] Fix array overflow in CFQ

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Vivek Goyal
Date: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 - 4:49 am

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:01:40PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:

Hi Jens,

busy_queues_avg[] definitely looks buggy. Looks like I introduced this bug
while converting corrado's logic to group logic. I will fix it in a while.
Sorry for the goof up here.

->service_trees[][] is not buggy. We maintain workload subclassification
only for RT and BE class. For IDLE class, there are no ASYNC_WORKLOAD,
SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD or SYNC_WORKLOAD. All the type of idle queues
go onto a separate service tree, service_tree_idle.

Thanks
Vivek

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Fix array overflow in CFQ, Andi Kleen, (Tue Oct 19, 2:10 am)
Re: [PATCH] Fix array overflow in CFQ, Jens Axboe, (Tue Oct 19, 3:01 am)
Re: [PATCH] Fix array overflow in CFQ, Vivek Goyal, (Tue Oct 19, 4:49 am)
Re: [PATCH] Fix array overflow in CFQ, Jens Axboe, (Tue Oct 19, 4:55 am)
Re: [PATCH] Fix array overflow in CFQ, Vivek Goyal, (Tue Oct 19, 5:33 am)
Re: [PATCH] Fix array overflow in CFQ, Andi Kleen, (Tue Oct 19, 6:23 am)
Re: [PATCH] Fix array overflow in CFQ, Vivek Goyal, (Tue Oct 19, 8:05 am)
Re: [PATCH] Fix array overflow in CFQ, Jeff Moyer, (Thu Oct 21, 9:53 am)