On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 02:27:02PM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
Great, it was a bit nasty of ceph to add that in without documenting
it, but I guess it got past reviewers so it was up to them to ack it
or point it out.
I think we should probably enforce a rule that dcache_lock not nest
inside i_lock :) Anybody wanting to do that in future had better have
a really good reason.
It does, thanks.
--