Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste of memory?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: J.H.
Date: Monday, October 18, 2010 - 11:12 am

On 10/16/2010 07:11 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:

Exciting, I saw that too.  Not sure I'm going to get to do a reboot on
master before Kernel summit (and it's OS upgrade) but I'm re-compiling
the kernel with IMA disabled.

Master's live backup machine was chewing nearly 4G of memory, and
if/when I flip some of the big frontend machines over this is going to
be a completely unacceptable waste of memory.

For the record I'm really not happy or keen on having to maintain a
custom kernel just to get this disabled, but if it's going to save me 4G
on a single quiet machine I can only assumes it's going to save me
several 10s of gigs on some of the bigger machines.


Ouch, thanks for giving us a heads up on it, definately not something I
expected to quietly creep in and bite me.  I should have a solution, if
one I'm not happy with, in the short term.  Hopefully Fedora/upstream
will have a better solution soon.

For the record I liked the explicit opt-in that was mentioned vs. and
automatic opt-in without disable we have now.

- John 'Warthog9' Hawley
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Oct 16, 12:20 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Oct 16, 5:49 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Oct 16, 6:13 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sun Oct 17, 11:46 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sun Oct 17, 11:49 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sun Oct 17, 11:52 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., J.H., (Mon Oct 18, 11:12 am)