Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste of memory?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ryan Ware
Date: Monday, October 18, 2010 - 9:46 am

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> wrote:

Not true.  We'll be using it in MeeGo.


Then let's bounce around ideas for making it more lightweight.  I'd
love to hear suggestions.

Ryan

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Oct 16, 12:20 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Oct 16, 5:49 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Oct 16, 6:13 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sun Oct 17, 11:46 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sun Oct 17, 11:49 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sun Oct 17, 11:52 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Ryan Ware, (Mon Oct 18, 9:46 am)