Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2010 » October » 17

Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste of memory?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Christoph Hellwig
Subject: Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste of memory?
Date: Sunday, October 17, 2010 - 11:46 am

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 07:40:08AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

By looking at what they turn on?  What happened to the good old idea
of actually auditing what you turn on?  It might be a bit too much
for every little driver, aven if that was helpful, but for security/
code with intricate hooks all over the kernel I think it is in order.

Especially as our merge requirements for security/ are a lot lower than
for the rest of the kernel given that James is very afraid of getting
whacked by Linux for not mering things.


I think you need to tune down your insult filter a bit :)

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste of ..., Dave Chinner, (Fri Oct 15, 11:52 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Oct 16, 12:20 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., H. Peter Anvin, (Sat Oct 16, 2:10 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Dave Chinner, (Sat Oct 16, 5:35 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Oct 16, 5:49 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., J.H., (Sat Oct 16, 5:54 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Kyle McMartin, (Sat Oct 16, 6:09 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Oct 16, 6:13 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Dave Chinner, (Sat Oct 16, 7:11 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Ingo Molnar, (Sat Oct 16, 10:40 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Ingo Molnar, (Sat Oct 16, 10:49 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Mimi Zohar, (Sat Oct 16, 10:57 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Peter Zijlstra, (Sun Oct 17, 4:02 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Eric Paris, (Sun Oct 17, 6:12 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Peter Zijlstra, (Sun Oct 17, 6:59 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Peter Zijlstra, (Sun Oct 17, 7:04 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Mimi Zohar, (Sun Oct 17, 7:09 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Eric Paris, (Sun Oct 17, 7:16 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sun Oct 17, 11:46 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sun Oct 17, 11:49 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sun Oct 17, 11:52 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Pavel Machek, (Sun Oct 17, 12:39 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Dave Chinner, (Sun Oct 17, 5:07 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., James Morris, (Sun Oct 17, 5:49 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Kyle McMartin, (Sun Oct 17, 11:25 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Andrew Morton, (Sun Oct 17, 11:36 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Dave Chinner, (Mon Oct 18, 2:29 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Oct 18, 4:57 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Mimi Zohar, (Mon Oct 18, 6:31 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Ted Ts'o, (Mon Oct 18, 7:59 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Oct 18, 8:02 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Eric Paris, (Mon Oct 18, 8:02 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Mimi Zohar, (Mon Oct 18, 9:03 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Ryan Ware, (Mon Oct 18, 9:44 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Ryan Ware, (Mon Oct 18, 9:46 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Eric Paris, (Mon Oct 18, 9:48 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Kyle McMartin, (Mon Oct 18, 10:10 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Kyle McMartin, (Mon Oct 18, 10:34 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Linus Torvalds, (Mon Oct 18, 10:56 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Oct 18, 11:06 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Ingo Molnar, (Mon Oct 18, 11:11 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., J.H., (Mon Oct 18, 11:12 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Oct 18, 11:13 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Eric Paris, (Mon Oct 18, 11:13 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Ingo Molnar, (Mon Oct 18, 11:19 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Eric Paris, (Mon Oct 18, 11:43 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., John Stoffel, (Mon Oct 18, 12:24 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Eric Paris, (Mon Oct 18, 5:58 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Oct 25, 6:18 am)