Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste of memory?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Saturday, October 16, 2010 - 2:10 pm

I'm confused ... what makes you think we are?  This might have been an unintentional misconfiguration...

"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org> wrote:


-- 
Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon any lack of formatting.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Oct 16, 12:20 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., H. Peter Anvin, (Sat Oct 16, 2:10 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Oct 16, 5:49 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Oct 16, 6:13 pm)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sun Oct 17, 11:46 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sun Oct 17, 11:49 am)
Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sun Oct 17, 11:52 am)