> Not if in_interrupt is set though?
quoted text
> +       if (per_cpu(io_wq_cpu, cpu) == current && !in_interrupt()) {
> 
> What I am missing here?

The interrupt doesn't block on the task.

Actually most likely that check isn't needed anyways because
that should not happen, was just pure paranoia from my side.

quoted text
> 
> (And assume there is only 1 CPU too for worst case behaviour, presumably.)

One per process, previously it was always one per CPU.

-Andi
-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/