Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Robin Holt
Date: Sunday, October 10, 2010 - 4:44 am

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:43:19PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

The 36-rc7 kernel does not boot at all either.  I don't have any decent
debug tools to dig in further.  It does fail on the same machine that
Russ was testing with, but passes on any that have a single blade as
the kernel Russ first identified as being a problem had.  Based upon my
vague recollection of the boot messages, it appears to fail in a similar
point in boot.  I would assume it is a similar problem.

Thanks,
Robin
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV, Russ Anderson, (Fri Oct 8, 2:34 pm)
Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Oct 8, 2:43 pm)
Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV, Yinghai Lu, (Fri Oct 8, 3:15 pm)
Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV, Yinghai Lu, (Fri Oct 8, 3:57 pm)
Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV, Russ Anderson, (Sat Oct 9, 5:59 am)
Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV, Robin Holt, (Sat Oct 9, 9:39 am)
Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV, Yinghai Lu, (Sat Oct 9, 11:06 am)
Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Oct 9, 11:39 am)
Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV, Ingo Molnar, (Sun Oct 10, 3:41 am)
Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV, Ingo Molnar, (Sun Oct 10, 3:43 am)
Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV, Robin Holt, (Sun Oct 10, 4:44 am)
Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV, Robin Holt, (Sun Oct 10, 4:56 am)
Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV, Ingo Molnar, (Sun Oct 10, 7:05 am)
Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV, Robin Holt, (Sun Oct 10, 3:51 pm)
[tip:x86/urgent] x86, numa: For each node, register the me ..., tip-bot for Yinghai Lu, (Mon Oct 11, 3:01 pm)
[tip:x86/urgent] x86, numa: For each node, register the me ..., tip-bot for Yinghai Lu, (Mon Oct 11, 3:28 pm)