> -----Original Message-----
> From:
linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org [mailto:linux-arm-
> kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Peter Zijlstra
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 1:14 PM
> To: Tomasz Fujak
> Cc: jpihet@mvista.com; Michal Nazarewicz; Pawel Osciak;
> jamie.iles@picochip.com; will.deacon@arm.com; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; acme@redhat.com; kyungmin.park@samsung.com;
> mingo@elte.hu; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Marek Szyprowski
> Subject: RE: [PATCH/RFC v2 0/3] Human readable platform-specific
> performance event support
>
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 12:57 +0100, Tomasz Fujak wrote:
>
> please educate your MUA to wrap lines at ~80.
>
> > Apparently I did not comprehend your attitude towards the events'
> > description being exported from the kernel.
> > There's been a lengthy discussion which ended in a conclusion that
> the
> > platform detection is a complicated task.
>
> If its really that complicated export a pmu identifier someplace.
>
> The fact is, the kernel simply doesn't use this list, we have perf in
> kernel so that resource scheduling and isolation can be done, for that
> we need to know how to program the hardware and we need to know about
> scheduling constraints, we do not need exhaustive lists of possible
> events, let alone descriptive text for them, in the kernel.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel